Legal Opinion

City of Oklahoma City v. Lacy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1959No. , 38174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

The broad question plaintiff in error seeks to have determined in this appeal is whether or not an area lying south of a line which would coincide with an east extension of Oklahoma City’s Northeast 36th Street, and east of such a line extending north from said City’s North Bryan Street, purporting to have been incorporated as the Town of Forest Park, exists (at all times involved in this controversy) as a separate town, or whether, by the purported annexation proceedings described herein, it has become a part of the City of Oklahoma City.

It is helpful in making an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barton v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Jones v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. McFadyen v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edmondson v. Siegfried Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Klopfenstein v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. State ex inf. Joyce-Hayes v. Twenty-Second Judicial CircuitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API