City of Oklahoma City v. Lacy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
The broad question plaintiff in error seeks to have determined in this appeal is whether or not an area lying south of a line which would coincide with an east extension of Oklahoma City’s Northeast 36th Street, and east of such a line extending north from said City’s North Bryan Street, purporting to have been incorporated as the Town of Forest Park, exists (at all times involved in this controversy) as a separate town, or whether, by the purported annexation proceedings described herein, it has become a part of the City of Oklahoma City.
It is helpful in making an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barton v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Jones v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- State Ex Rel. McFadyen v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edmondson v. Siegfried Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Klopfenstein v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- State ex inf. Joyce-Hayes v. Twenty-Second Judicial CircuitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993