Frederic L. Grant Shoe Co. v. W. M. Laird Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO’ THE BISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The factslare stated in the opinion..
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
delivered,the opinion óf the court.
This case comes up on a certificate concerning the jurisdiction, of the District Court on the following facts: The W. M. Laird Company1 filed a petition in bankruptcy against the Frederic L- Grant Shoe Company, alleging acts of bankruptcy and setting up,a claim for $3,732.80 for the breach of an express warranty of shoes sold to it' by the latter. The Shoe ■ Company answered, denying the foregoing ¿negations, and denying that the claim alleged was a provable claim. The case coming on to be tried before a jury, it moved, the court to dismiss the proceeding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Schuchardt v. AllensSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Tindle v. BirkettSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- C. H. Nichols Lumber Co. v. FransonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Allen v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lamar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.