Legal Opinion

Tindle v. Birkett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 1907No. 217PublishedCited by 56 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

This was an action brought in 1899 to recover damages claimed to have been sustained in consequence of specified false and fraudulent representations made by the firm of which the defendant was survivor, by reason whereof plaintiffs alleged they were deceived into selling goods to defendant’s firm, which they otherwise would not have done. The complaint contained three counts, setting up separate items of damages, namely, $349.30, $230.83 and $321.73 for goods sold, and judgment was demanded for the aggregate with interest on each item.

One of the defenses was that plaintiffs’ claims were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Tindle v. . BirkettNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Clarke v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Ford v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API