Legal Opinion

Nashua Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 18, 1997No. 942227APublished

1Opinion of the CourtFabricant, J.

INTRODUCTION

This action presents the question whether Liberty-Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty") is obligated to defend and indemnify Nashua Corporation (“Nashua”) with respect to certain claims made against Nashua for hazardous waste contamination. Presently before the Court are: Nashua’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding the duty to defend as against all the claims: Liberty’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the duty to defend against all the claims, and as to the duty to indemnify as to certain *434of the claims; and each side’s motions to strike certain supporting…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API