State v. Rodriguez
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Eddie Rodriguez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b) and sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a public elementary school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that there was insufficient evidence produced at trial to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*344The following facts, as the jury reasonably could have found, and procedural history are…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. CaracogliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.