Legal Opinion
Schlesinger v. Regenstreif
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin H. Ostebman, J.
This is an action wherein plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from interfering with their right to use a patented embossing machine owned by Chavennes Industrial Synthetics, Inc. (hereinafter called “ C. I. S.”) and leased to the defendants and Martin Silverman pursuant to a written agreement dated October 27, 1953. Plaintiffs- and defendants are converters of plastic sheeting. Silverman, who is a printer of patterns on plastics and converts same into designs, also conducts a separate business under the name of Plastic Printing Corp.
It appears that Silverman first learned of the C. I. S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Paige v. . FaureNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Nassau Hotel Co. v. Barnett & Barse Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Rock-Ola Mfg. Corp. v. Filben Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re New Era Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- R. C. Gluck & Co. v. TankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- In Re Lehal Realty AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- New York State Mortgage Loan Enforcement & Administration Corp. v. Syracuse Intown Houses, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1984