Legal Opinion

Twilley v. Twilley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1943No. 14388PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Justice.

1. In the instant suit for divorce by a wife, in which the husband filed a cross-action praying for a total divorce in his own behalf, and recovered a verdict accordingly, whether the cross-action should be construed as failing to allege that the complainant therein had resided ..in this State more than twelve months before it was filed, and whether, if so, it would be defective as an application for divorce, these questions were not raised by the general grounds of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, so as to require a decision thereon by this court, where the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Aucutt v. AucuttTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Aucutt v. AucuttTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Coker v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grice v. GriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Roop Grocery Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Brinson v. BrinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Moseley v. MoseleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Holcombe v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API