Moon v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON THE STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DALLY, Judge.
The majority of the Court now adopts for its opinion the dissenting opinion on original submission. The “straw man” argument presented, the assumptions made, and the discussions concerning the voluntar-iness of the plea, in the opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, are wholly irrelevant. The record reflects that the appellant was carefully admonished concerning his guilty plea and that his constitutional rights were fully protected, but in view of the opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part a portion of the record…
2Cited by172 opinions
- Mendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Moses v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Fairfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Aldrich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.