Legal Opinion
Munoz v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided January 27, 1993No. 13-91-334-CR, 13-91-335-CRPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Santiago Munoz appeals from two convictions of illegal investment. 1 Both convictions resulted from plea bargain agreements. The trial court assessed punishment at eight years’ imprisonment for each offense.
On cause number 1274-E, appellant brings twenty-one points of error, claiming that the judgment recitals are incorrect, that the trial court wholly failed to admonish him before accepting his guilty plea, that appellant did not personally enter his plea, and that insufficient evidence exists' to convict.
On cause number 495-E, appellant complains by eleven points…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Potts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Heberling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Lindsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
- George v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.