Clifford A. Hourston, Doing Business as Southern Cross Engineering and Foundry Works, in No. 71-1931 v. Harvlan, Inc., in No. 71-1932
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge
This is an appeal by Harvlan, Inc. (“defendant”) from a district court judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding $40,000 to Clifford A. Hourston (“plaintiff”) as a finder’s fee. A previous jury had awarded plaintiff $50,000 which was set aside and a new trial ordered. On cross-appeal plaintiff challenges the new trial order and seeks reinstatement of the original verdict.
We have decided that the judge presiding over the first trial abused his discretion in granting defendant’s motion for a new trial. Therefore, only the events of that first proceeding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Grove v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Aloysius Harkins v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- McVay v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Klein v. HollingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- W.A. Wright, Inc. And A.C. Excavating, Inc. v. Kdi Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Rose Hall, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Overseas Banking Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.