Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Rahm

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1989No. 87-4074PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the district court’s decision that the Social Security Act preempts the state of Washington’s procedures for seeking reimbursement from patients involuntarily committed to state hospitals. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs-appellees are a class of patients involuntarily committed to Washington state mental hospitals. The class is defined as those patients who receive Social Security Old Age Survivor’s and Disability Insurance (OASDI) benefits, and for whom the state is not the representative payee. The defendants-appellants are officials of the State of Washington…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. San Bernardino Physicians' Services Medical Group, Inc. v. County of San Bernardino, Board of Supervisors for San Bernardino, Francis L. ComunaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Gorrie v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Bradley v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Creaton v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. C.G.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State of Washington v. Jason Michael CatlingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Kolbeson v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API