Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Jason Michael Catling

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 2018No. 34852-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FILED MARCH 15, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 34852-1-III Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) JASONM. CATLING, ) PUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) KORSMO, J. - Jason Catling challenges mandatory legal financial obligations (LFOs) imposed following his conviction for delivering a controlled substance, heroin, arguing both that (1) no LFOs should have been imposed because his sole legal source of income is Social Security disability and (2) the superior court…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CatlingWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State Of Washington, Resp/cross-app v. Bradley Michael Martin, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. State of Washington v. Eli GallegosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State of Washington v. Justin A. WelkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State of Washington v. Phillippe Antwan BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API