Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Wymore

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Original action in quo warranto to determine the question of respondent’s title to the office of prosecuting attorney of Cole County. The information is conventional. In substance, it alleges that respondent was duly elected to said office and qualified on January 1, 1937; that it was his duty to prosecute criminal actions in said county; that he willfully and corruptly failed, neglected and refused to prosecute certain criminal actions therein specified; that by said conduct he thereby forfeited said office; that notwithstanding said conduct and forfeiture he usurped said office and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Reid v. WalbridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Hamilton v. GuinotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Manker v. FaulhaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. State ex rel. Heimburger v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Brown v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. State v. PaulMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Wann v. Reorganized School District No. 6 of St. Francois CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API