Latvian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
Plaintiff sues for just compensation for the taking of its steamship Denny. The defendant has filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court because, it says, it is not alleged that plaintiff has exhausted its administrative remedy before the Maritime Commission, which is authorized by section 902 of the Merchant Marine Act, as amended (sec. 1242 (d), 46 TJ. S. C.) to determine just compensation for any vessel requisitioned, and that this court has no jurisdiction until this has been done.
Defendant relies alone on our decision in Schaeffer et al. v. United States, No. 49100, 114 C. Cls. 568,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Universal Ecsco Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Farrand Optical Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955