Legal Opinion
United States v. Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1988No. 87-3671PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
The appellants are residents of the Fair-view Training Center. The State of Oregon operates the facility. The conditions at that institution are presently the subject of a law suit filed by the United States government against the State of Oregon claiming failure to provide minimally adequate training, medical care, sanitation and trained staff. The lawsuit is authorized by the provisions of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (“CRIPA”), 42 U.S. C. § 1997 et seq. The appellants seek to intervene in that litigation and appeal from the district court’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jackson v. HayakawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States of America v. J.B. Stringfellow, Jr., Concerned Neighbors in Action and Penny Newman, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Territory of the Virgin Islands Ex Rel. DiRuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Jenkins v. State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Western Watersheds Project v. Deb HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.