Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Central Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The decision in this case is as follows:—

“ First—That the assessments mentioned in the complaint in said action were made in due form, and at the proper time, by the assessor of the city and county of San Francisco; and all the forms of law in relation to the assessment of property for taxation in said county have been complied with on the part of said assessor.
*468“Second—That the defendant is a corporation existing under the laws of the United States, and of this State, and as such is now, and for many years last past has been, the owner of a line of railroad known as the Central Pacific…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Germania Trust Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. San Francisco Etc. R.R. Co. v. StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API