Legal Opinion

San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1882No. 8,047PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Application for writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

An application on certiorari to annul certain orders of respondent assessing the property pf a railroad corporation. The following is a summary of petitioner’s points:

1. Eespondent had no power to make the assessment without first ascertaining the value of the property according to some law, order, or rule regulating its mode of action.

2. Sections 3664 and 3665 of the Political Code, as the same were adopted by the Legislature of 1880, are void, because the title thereto did not express their object; and, as amended in 1881, are void, because not passed by the constitutional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houghton v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Appeal of North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Erickson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Idaho Telephone Company v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API