Legal Opinion

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Killingsworth

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1935No. 25160PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was assignee of a certain oil and gas mining lease, and was engaged in producing oil from the leased premises. The Carter Oil Company was purchasing all the oil produced and making payment therefor in accordance with a written division order executed by defendant and certain persons who were the royalty owners at the time of the execution of the division order. The defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, each purchased certain royalty interests in the premises and notified defendant of their purchases. Defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Logan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Clark v. Slick Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Owens v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Bonfils v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Hawk v. SaylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Carter Oil Co. v. Crude Oil Co. (Oklahoma)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Carter Oil Co. v. Crude Oil Co. (Oklahoma)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API