Legal Opinion
United Mine Workers v. Rag American Coal Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 30, 2004No. 02-1456PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
This dispute arises out of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) and Amax Coal Company (Amax Coal). 1 In 1993, the UMWA and Amax Coal signed the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement (NBCWA), which required Amax Coal to include in any sale of its operations contract terms mandating that the purchaser assume Amax Coal’s obligations under the NBCWA; In 1996, Amax Coal sold a coal preparation plant to Cyprus Plateau Mining Company (Cyprus Plateau) but did not include in the terms of the sale provisions for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weese v. SchukmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wagner v. Live Nation Motor Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Freeman v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- State of Texas v. Joseph R BidenDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021