Legal Opinion

Richeson v. Wagar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1938No. Docket No. 72, Calendar No. 40,127PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a chancery action to set aside three quitclaim deeds. It appears that in November, 1920, Olive W. Wagar, widow (now Olive W. Armstrong), and Rolland D. Weinberg became the owners of 40 acres of land in Gladwin county, Michigan. The land was partially cleared and generally considered worthless. Mrs. Wagar paid the taxes on the land for the years of 1921, 1922, and 1923. No further taxes were paid by either Mrs. Wagar or Mr. Weinberg and in 1927 the land was sold at the tax sale for the taxes of 1924. On the tax sale Wellington Wagar purchased the land and assigned the certificate to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. WhitelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kaiser v. NummerdorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Sponseller v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McClellan v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allied Steel and Conveyors, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Christensen v. ChristensenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API