Legal Opinion

Darling v. Gosselin

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1999No. Civil 980226PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

I

[¶ 1] Margaret Darling appeals the district court’s order directing the judicial referee to amend her order. The district court concluded post-judgment interest cannot be properly docketed by the clerk of the district court. We reverse and remand.

[¶ 2] On December 28, 1992, Margaret Darling received a judgment against Donny Gosselin establishing the paternal relationship between Gosselin and the parties’ child. The judgment ordered Gosselin to pay child support of $350 per month, one-half of the child’s health insurance premiums, and one-half of any uncovered medical expenses.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Throndset v. HawkensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Steffes v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Fuson v. SchaibleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Gabriel v. GabrielNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Baranyk v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ConleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Marchus v. MarchusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Norberg v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Brady v. J.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Martin v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API