Legal Opinion

Ware v. McPherson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14200PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This case is appealed upon the sole ground that the verdict of the jury, awarding plaintiff #3,000 damages for personal injuries received when hit by defendants’ automobile, is excessive. Defendants claim that the trial court erred in denying their motion for new trial based upon the above contention and asked for a reversal of the judgment entered upon said verdict or for reduction of the award.

It is elementary that in such cases as this the amount of damages is committed first to the sound discretion of the jury and next to the discretion of the trial judge in ruling upon the motion for new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lahti v. McMenaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Martin v. SheaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Willoughby v. ZylstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Brown v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Martin v. MiqueuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API