Legal Opinion

Nacional Financiera, S. A. v. Speyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

On this submission of controversy under sections 546 to 548 of the Civil Practice Act the question presented is whether a fund in the hands of defendants Speyer & Company should be paid to plaintiff, as assignee of the United States of Mexico (hereinafter called “ Mexico ”), or whether Speyer & Company should pay over the fund to bondholders of the Mexican Government’s Four Per Cent Gold Bonds of 1904 (hereafter called the “ bondholders ”).

Plaintiff Nacional Financiera, S. A., is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Mexico. Defendants are copartners engaged at the. times…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Guffanti v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Rogers Locomotive & MacHine Works v. KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Noyes v. . First National Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ehag Eisenbahnwerte Holding Aktiengesellschaft v. Banca Nationala a RomanieiNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Driscoll v. Empire Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Lewis v. Chase National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API