Legal Opinion
Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 21, 1947Published
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
The complaint has been dismissed on the ground that the action was not commenced within the six months limited by section 625 of the Banking Law after the rejection of plaintiff’s claims by the Superintendent of Banks. The order and judgment appealed from should be affirmed for the reason that the time limit thus prescribed Avas intended to take precedence over statutes of limitation established by other laws.
The complaint alleges that when the Superintendent of Banks took possession of the business and property in New York State of the Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd., on or about December 6,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Herget v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Noyes v. . First National Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of International M. Co. (Broderick)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Noyes v. First National Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.