Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Tuthill
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 2000No. 98-PR-1181PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:
This matter comes before the court on appellants’ appeal of the trial court’s denial of the Trustee’s Motion to Reconsider its denial of the Trustee’s Consent Motion to Reform Trust. 1 Appellants argued in the trial court that a scrivener’s mistake had made it impossible for the Trustee to effectuate the intent of the decedent, Mr. Tuthill, to provide all of the income and as much of the principal as was necessary from the Trust to support Mrs. Tuthill during her lifetime. The single issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the appellants’ Motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ike v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Pond v. PondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Cabaniss v. CabanissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ingersoll v. IngersollDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- United States v. $119,030.00 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
- In re Trust Under Will of Wallace B. Flint for the Benefit of Katherine F. ShadekCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
- In re Ethel F. Peierls Charitable Lead UnitrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
- In Re Durosko Marital TrustDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.