Legal Opinion

Horger v. New York University Medical Center

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 28, 1986No. 84 Civ. 7688 (GLG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Timothy Horger brought this medical malpractice action to recover for permanent and irreversible injuries allegedly sustained from the implantation of a penile prosthesis. Defendant Dr. Bruce Grynbaum, the physician responsible for Horger’s general case, referred Horger to defendant Dr. Pablo Morales, who performed the operation. Both doctors are affiliated with defendant New York University Medical Center (“N.Y.U.”). Subject matter jurisdiction is premised on complete diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1982).

All of the defendants move for summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Johnson Service Company v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Environmental Concern, Inc. v. Larchwood Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vista Co. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. David v. Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API