Lesser v. Great Lakes Casualty Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The sole question to be determined in this case is whether the trial court was warranted in finding that at the time of her injury Mrs. Lapham was employed by plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs were the owners of the apartment house in suit known as Park View Apartments in which there were sixteen apartments. Mrs. Lapham and her husband lived there for a year and a half before the accident occurred, occupying an apartment on the first floor at the front of the building. The direct testimony •of Mrs. Lapham upon the agreement between herself and plaintiffs, with respect to her services, is as follows:
“Q…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. HilderbrandtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Svacek v. ShelleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Gilt Edge DairyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- State v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. Gilt Edge DairyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955