Svacek v. Shelley
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AREND, Justice.
This is an action by the plaintiff, who is -the appellant here, to recover damages for ■personal injuries received when he was assaulted by one Williamson, an employee ■of the defendant, Rose Shelley. Williamson was named in the complaint as a party ■ defendant. He did not appear at the trial of the case, though he was represented by the same counsel who represented the defendant, Rose Shelley. The jury brought in a verdict for damages against Williamson and a directed verdict in favor of Rose Shelley. The plaintiff has appealed from the directed verdict and that portion of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mallory v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Murray v. Modoc State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- La Lone v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Fleming v. BronfinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Connes v. Molalla Transport System, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Williams v. Feather Sound, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Southeast Apartments Management, Inc. v. JackmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.