Legal Opinion
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Gilt Edge Dairy
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1955No. 4922PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is which, if either, of two casualty insurance policies covers a loss sustained by the insured, Gilt Edge Dairy.
The appellant, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, issued its standard workmen’s compensation and employers’ liability policy, in which it agreed to assume the liability of Gilt Edge to its employees under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of Oklahoma, 85 O.S.1951 § 1 et seq.; and to indemnify it “against loss by reason of the liability imposed upon him by law for damages on account of such injuries to such of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Ins. Co. v. StukesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- B. & H. Passmore Metal & Roofing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Bennett v. The Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Central Nat. v. Utica Nat.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Thill Candy Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. Gilt Edge DairyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955