Legal Opinion
McCullough v. Clark
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 14, 2001PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAKIN, J.:
¶ 1 Maren Clark appeals from the orders denying reconsideration of his preliminary objections.
¶ 2 After an automobile accident on July 29, 1994, Bernice and Donald McCullough, and their daughter, Danelle McCullough, initiated separate actions May 14, 1996, by filing praecipes for writ of summons. The writs were issued May 15, 1996, and served upon Sharon Thayer the next day; appellant Maren Clark was not served. The trial court summarized the remaining facts and procedure:
Frank J. Micale, Esq. entered an appearance on behalf of both Clark and Thayer on September 24, 1996 and, in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Capek v. DevitoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Wiernik v. PHH U.S. Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ambrose v. Cross Creek CondominiumsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dowling v. Blue Ridge Communications, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2010
- Zazzera v. Roche, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2001
- Estate of: George PorupskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Greenbriar Village v. Equity Lifestyles, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- K.A.W. v. G.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.