Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Murray

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1927No. 3096PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

"WATSON, J.

In an action against appellant, wages due him were garnished. The garnishee’s return showed an indebtedness of $130. Being a resident of New Mexico, the head of a family, and not the owner of a homestead, appellant laid claim to the whole of said indebtedness as exempt under Code 1915, § 2327. The contention was overruled, and judgment was given against appellant and the garnishee for $32.50.

Secton 2327, supra, on which appellant relies, is as follows:

' ‘Any resident of this state who is the head of a family, and not the owner of a homestead, may hold exempt…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pomeroy v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Goodwin v. ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Goodwin v. . ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Enzor & McNeill v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Wilson v. BartholomewMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Laughlin v. LumbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Advance Loan Company v. KovachNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hewatt v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Robison v. CampbellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API