Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Decker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1970No. Cr. 395Published

1DissentTeigen, Chief Justice

I dissent. The majority, by their opinion, have made it a requirement that in misdemeanor cases where the defendant pleads guilty a complete verbatim record must be made of all the proceedings before the court, leading to and including the sentence. If this is not done, the defendant is entitled to a new trial. I cannot agree that this is, or ought to be, the law. The majority have interpreted subsection 8 of Section 29-24-02, N.D.C.C., which provides a cause for granting a “new trial,” as being applicable even though no trial was held. This is such a case. The defendant entered a plea of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. State v. SeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Thomas v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Harding v. City of DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API