Legal Opinion

Lake County Clerk's Office v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2002No. 45S00-0102-CV-105PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

Under Indiana's statutory bail scheme, a trial court can admit a defendant to bail by requiring the defendant to execute a bail bond by using a bail bondsman or by depositing ten percent of the bail amount in cash with the clerk of the trial court. In this case the trial court declared this scheme unconstitutional under both the federal and state constitutions because it treats bail bondsmen differently from defendants who post ten percent cash bonds. Concluding that Indiana's bail scheme is not unconstitutional, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Background

Introduction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Matter of Tina T.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Hobart Common Council v. Behavioral Institute of Indiana, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Herbert Smith v. City of Hammond, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Galloway v. HadleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Little Arm Inc. v. AdamsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Bonney v. Indiana Finance AuthorityIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API