Legal Opinion
Raymark Industries, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. George Q. Lai
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 2, 1992No. 91-2099PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
Raymark Industries, Inc. (Raymark) appeals from an order of the district court that affirmed a bankruptcy court order denying Raymark’s motion to enforce an automatic stay against California state court proceedings. Both the California appellate courts and the bankruptcy court held that the state court action was not stayed by Raymark’s involuntary bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court relied on our decision in Mid-Jersey Nat’l Bank v. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 518 F.2d 640 (3d Cir.1975). There, we held that the automatic stay of the Bankruptcy Act,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In Re Margaret J. Myers, Debtor. Margaret J. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Martin v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.