Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Radford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1923No. 18018PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— Respondents, as plaintiffs, brought this action to recover a brokers’ commission for procuring a tenant for an apartment house building. From a judgment as prayed for, the defendant has appealed.

It is admitted that the prospective tenant was first interviewed, and shown the plans of the building to be erected and leased, by another broker, and the case turns upon the question of whether or not these prior negotiations were broken off before respondents intervened and interested the same person, who finally executed the lease. The testimony which was received is conflicting upon this point,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. French v. Seattle Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sound Timber Co. v. Danaher Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. FluhartWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. NewbernCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. State v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Quayle v. KnoxWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Cole v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API