Legal Opinion

State v. Fluhart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1923No. 17494PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The appellants, defendants, were convicted of the crime of grand larceny by obtaining money by false pretenses, and have appealed.

The information. charges that, on or about April 5, 1921, in King county, Washington, the appellants fraudulently and feloniously represented to one Gus Anderson that, they were the owners of a sawmill at Offut Lake, in Thurston county, free from incum-brances ; that it was in operation by them at that time and was making money; that they were engaged in forming a new corporation to, purchase the mill and additional equipment; that Gus Anderson, believing the false…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Centralia Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Reynolds v. Pacific Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Sterling v. RadfordWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API