Legal Opinion

Lopez-Villa v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 2022No. 22/21PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brigido Lopez-Villa v. State, No. 22, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW — REVIEW — PRESENTATION AND RESERVATION IN LOWER COURT OF GROUNDS OF REVIEW — SUMMONING AND IMPANELING JURY For a party to preserve its objection to a trial court’s omission or modification of proposed voir dire questions, the party must object or indicate disagreement at the time the trial court makes its ruling. This is true unless the party is not given the opportunity to object at the time of the trial court’s ruling, the trial court expressly recognizes the party’s objection, or the party later…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. In the Matter of the Petition of HoseinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Huggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. In the Matter of the Petition of HoseinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API