Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Vandercook

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1924No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The Dixie highway, so-called, extends from Detroit to Toledo, passing through the county of Monroe. In June, 1918, prohibition of intoxicating liquors was in force in this State but not in Toledo, Ohio. The sheriff of Monroe county experienced difficulty in enforcing the liquor law and requested aid from the governor. June 26, 1918, the governor issued “General Orders No. 36,” reading:

“1. The sheriff, prosecuting attorney, and chairman of the board of supervisors in Monroe having stated in writing that the authorities of that county are unable to cope with the lawlessness and disorder arising…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Coleman v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Dow v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. In re MoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Wadsworth v. ShortallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Constantin v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1932
  3. Neu v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Armstrong v. SengoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. United States v. Minoru YasuiDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API