Legal Opinion

Volding v. Harnish

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 1952No. 35,760PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action for personal injuries brought by plaintiff, Myron J. Voiding, against defendant Roy M. Harnish, lessee of a store building at Cloquet in which he operated what is known as a “Federated Store,” and defendant C. A. Carlson, a building contractor employed by Harnish to make improvements therein. The jury re turned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $22,500 against Harnish only, and for convenience he will hereinafter be referred to as defendant. On July 21, 1950, the trial court made its order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Anderson v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Meiners v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Gentle v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Crawford v. Woodrich Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Monson v. ArcandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Manteuffel v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API