Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Interstate Power Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1935No. 30,436PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Devaney, Chief Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants.

Plaintiff was employed by the Delevan Telephone Company at Delevan, Minnesota, as a line foreman whose duty it was to look after the operation and maintenance of line wires of said company. Defendant Interstate Power Company owned and operated a power line running north and south on the east side of the highway about four miles west of Delevan. The Delevan Telephone Company owned and operated a telephone line running north and south on the west side of said highway.

Plaintiff in his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Behr v. SothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Uotila v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Horgen v. Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Swanson v. J. L. Shiely Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Tevoght v. PolsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API