Anderson v. Interstate Power Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Devaney, Chief Justice.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants.
Plaintiff was employed by the Delevan Telephone Company at Delevan, Minnesota, as a line foreman whose duty it was to look after the operation and maintenance of line wires of said company. Defendant Interstate Power Company owned and operated a power line running north and south on the east side of the highway about four miles west of Delevan. The Delevan Telephone Company owned and operated a telephone line running north and south on the west side of said highway.
Plaintiff in his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Behr v. SothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Uotila v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Horgen v. Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Swanson v. J. L. Shiely Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Tevoght v. PolsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.