Legal Opinion
State v. PR INVESTMENTS
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided February 26, 2004No. 14-00-00091-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
In this eminent domain case, the State of Texas appeals from a judgment in which the trial court (1) dismissed the State’s petition for condemnation without prejudice and (2) awarded appellees PR Investments (PRI) and Specialty Retailers, Inc., their attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred defending against the condemnation. We hold, under the eminent domain procedures set forth in the Texas Property Code chapter 21, the trial court (a) lacked jurisdiction to consider a condemnation plan not presented to the special commissioners, (b) correctly dismissed the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PR Investments & Specialty Retailers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- City of McKinney v. Eldorado Park, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
- State v. J. Grady Brown, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
- City of McKinney, Texas v. Eldorado Park, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
- Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Raymond Michael Read, Mark William Read, Owners, and Thomas I. Fetzer, II, Lienholder, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.