Legal Opinion
Continental Oil Company v. Burns
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 15, 1970No. Civ. A. 3909PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, District Judge.
This action was brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, by Continental Oil Company (“Continental”) against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“the Board”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“the Commission”) seeking a declaratory judgment that Interpretation § 226.401 of the Truth in Lending Act 1 (“the Act”), issued by the Board on April 22, 1969, is invalid. The American Petroleum Institute was granted leave to appear as amicus curiae and to file a memorandum in support of Continental’s prayer for a declaratory judgment.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Brown Express, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Noel v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Gosman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Esther Charles v. Krauss Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Gerlach v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.