Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Shapiro

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 3, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

This is a motion to strike out a counterclaim, in the amount of $9,824, interposed by the tenant in a proceeding to dispossess him as a holdover. There is no demand for a judgment for rent.

The petitioner urges, as grounds for striking out the counterclaim, that it is improperly interposed, and that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain it. No question is raised as to its sufficiency.

Petitioner contends in support of his position that although the express language of section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act permits either an equitable or legal defense or counterclaim, the intent of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Byrne v. PaddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. 240 West 37th Street Co. v. LippmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Harfried Realty Co. v. Spuyten Amusement Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  5. Harfried Realty Co. v. Spuyten Amusement Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API