Legal Opinion

Harfried Realty Co. v. Spuyten Amusement Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 12, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, David C., J.

The landlord institutes this summary proceeding for the non-payment of rent under a written lease. In its answer the tenant sets up a counterclaim, consisting of the allegations that the landlord carelessly and negligently allowed and permitted the water draining from the roof of the adjoining building (owned and controlled by this landlord) to run down and into the premises demised to the tenant herein, so as to cause said waters to be collected in the basements, toilets and other parts of the demised premises, resulting in damage to the tenant herein in the claimed sum of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Byrne v. PaddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Meyerhoffer v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Handshke v. LoysenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Drago v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Times Square Improvement Co. v. Fleischmann Vienna Model Bakery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harfried Realty Co. v. Spuyten Amusement Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  2. Coleman Holding Corp. v. AltmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ShapiroCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API