240 West 37th Street Co. v. Lippman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
We are of opinion that in summary proceedings a tenant may interpose a counterclaim for breach of the landlord’s duty to repair. While agreeing with the Appellate Term that the counterclaim here pleaded was insufficient, we are of opinion that the judgment in favor of the landlord should be reversed and a new trial ordered upon which the tenant may move to amend. The dismissal at the opening of the case was solely upon the ground that it had not been properly interposed. This was error. Had a motion been directed to its sufficiency, the tenant could have moved to amend.
The determination of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Steinberg v. CarrerasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Birnbaum v. Yankee Whaler, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Haskell v. SuritaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- Kuhn v. GriffinOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- Fry v. WeyenIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.