Legal Opinion
Leigh v. Lynton
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1949No. Civil Action No. 9277PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ABRUZZO, District Judge.
This motion is made to dismiss the action or, in lieu thereof, to quash the return of the summons served upon the defendant, Phillip Lynton. I think the service of the summons and complaint must be quashed. These are the uncontroverted facts;
*29Phillip Lynton, a native of Great Britain, came to the United States in 1946 and moved to an apartment in Los Angeles, California. The Lyntons as tenants entered into a lease with the owners of the housing accommodations, the subj ect of this dispute, for a term of one year ending August 31, 1947. There was an option to extend the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Earle v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Skidmore v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stephen Borzeka v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. Of Tulsa v. IngertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- James v. Russell F. Davis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1958
- Desalvo v. Clarity Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. Of Tulsa v. IngertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953