Skidmore v. Green
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint against defendant Samuel Whit-taker, on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over him. Allegedly, process was not properly served, pursuant to Rule 4 (d) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, since the summons and complaint were not left at defendant Whit-taker’s usual place of abode and he is no longer a resident of the State of New York.
Plaintiff, a resident of West Virginia, seeks to recover damages for injuries resulting from an accident on October 16, 1939, near…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Sara A. Karlsson v. Baruch RabinowitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Ames Nowell v. Iris Calder NowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Karlin v. AvisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. TurnerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.