Legal Opinion
Hemphill v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 12, 2001No. Civ.A. DKC 99-654PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, Judge.
Plaintiff Allegra Hemphill, proceeding pro se, alleges that Defendant Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (“Johnson and Johnson”) manufactures and distributes products which infringe on her patent, U.S. Patent 4,557,720 (“the ’720 patent”). 1 Presently pending and ready for resolution are three motions. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (“JJCCI”) has filed a Mo tion for Leave to Permissively Intervene. Defendant McNeil has filed both a Motion for Summary Judgment for Noninfringement and a Motion to Bifurcate. 2 The issues are fully briefed and no hearing is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hemphill v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hemphill v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hemphill v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Hemphill v. Proctor & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Hemphill v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.