Legal Opinion
Weishaar v. Pendleton
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. This is an action by Andrew Weishaar against D. E. Pendleton, ¥m. S. Flynn and N. F. Canavan, appellants, and Thos. Edgar, J. Susee and Jake Cole, to recover the amount due on a promissory note. There was a judgment for plaintiff and the defendants Pendleton, Flynn and Canavan appeal. The facts are set out in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey
The defendants Pendleton, Edgar and Susee, on the 23d day of October, 1912, made and delivered to the plaintiff a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“$400.00. Portland, Oregon, October 23, 1912.
“Ninety days after date, without grace, I promise to pay to the order of Jake Cole, at the office of Fulton & Bowerman, at Portland, Oregon, four hundred and no/100 dollars in gold coin of the United States of America, of the present standard value, with interest thereon in like gold coin at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from date until paid, for value received, interest to be paid at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCall v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Bade v. HibberdOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Baker City v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Drake v. SwortsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Jennings v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Cooper v. Hillsboro Garden TractsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Joseph Milling Co. v. First Bank of JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Hill v. McCrowOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Schipfer v. StoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.