Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Frazier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Multnomah: Melvin C. George, Judge. Action in support of a garnishment'by O. O. Jennings against Wm. Frazier and others, resulting in a judgment for the garnishees, from which plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a proceeding by garnishment against Frazier & McLean to subject certain property in their possession, formerly belonging to the defendant Seed, to the payment of a judgment recovered by the plaintiff against Seed. It is averred in the allegations that on June 11, 1904, plaintiff commenced an action against Seed to recover money, and that such proceedings were thereafter had in such action that on November 3, 1904, a judgment Avas duly rendered in his favor and against Seed for $5,000; that an execution was immediately issued thereon, and, together AAdth a notice of garnishment, served…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moody v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Luse v. Isthmus Transit Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Harris v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Daly v. LarsenOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Lyons v. LeahyOregon Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boothe v. Farmers & Traders Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Freeman v. TrummerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Franklin v. NorthrupOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Siverson v. ClantonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API